Model 1: Cognition-Action-Result

Overview

Let’s discuss the first framework: the Cognition-Action-Result framework. What does it mean? You’ll often find people focusing solely on results, asking, “How do I achieve a specific outcome?” They don’t consider that to achieve a result, an action must first occur. Results don’t magically appear in your mouth or stomach.

Many “lazy questions” aren’t about people not wanting results; they simply don’t want to put in any effort. They hope others will complete tasks for them, demonstrating a reluctance to contribute. These individuals are essentially making requests, even demands, expecting not only answers but also for others to carry out the necessary actions. In essence, they desire the result without the corresponding effort. This attitude offers minimal real-world competitiveness because no one will feed you; everyone must eat for themselves.

Cognition: Systematizing the Essence of Problems

So, how do actions originate? First, you need to establish cognition. Understanding a problem isn’t just a superficial view; it’s a systematized thinking framework. Cognition is about systematically viewing the essence of a problem. Systematization is a concept we’ll discuss extensively in this course. Systematizing cognition helps us understand the core of problems, thus providing guidance for action. Only by seeing through the essence can your actions be sustained.

Many people ask how to persevere. I often reply that it’s because they haven’t clearly seen the essence of the problem. Without grasping the essence, actions don’t receive positive feedback, and you naturally become disinclined to continue. Only a systematic understanding of the essence can sustain action. Actions must constantly be fine-tuned based on specific circumstances to bring about the desired results. By continuously reviewing the results, we can further enhance our ability to systematically understand the essence, forming the “Cognition-Action-Result” cycle.

Action: The Path from Cognition to Practice

Remember, after learning this first model, don’t just ask what the result is; ask what the essence of the problem is. Frequently asking “how to do it” or “what to do” only addresses the surface of the problem. The real key is understanding the essence. Only a systematic cognitive understanding leads to effective action and, ultimately, good results. If the result is unsatisfactory, we can adjust our cognition through review, checking for deviations in our understanding of the essence and making improvements.

Result: How to Obtain Expected Results through Action

In practice, ensuring you enhance your cognition and use a systematic framework to understand problems allows you to take more effective action and achieve better results. By constantly adjusting and optimizing cognition and action, you’ll better achieve your goals and improve your performance in practical application.

Case Study: Practical Application and Effects

Let’s examine some practical cases. For example, the ¥899 career coaching program and the ¥40,000 teacher training course seem vastly different in cost. But from an economic perspective, what defines “expensive”? If you are the end consumer, are you willing to pay for this expense? If the ¥899 training leads to significant career advancement and is covered by your company, its value is justifiable. Similarly, if the ¥40,000 teacher training helps you gain more opportunities and income in your career, it is also justifiable.

Summary and Enhancement: How to Optimize the Cognition-Action-Result Model

Ultimately, using an economic perspective to analyze problems helps us more clearly understand the concepts of “expensive” and “cheap.” When judging the value of anything, we should consider who pays the final cost and whether that cost aligns with a reasonable price. Through this systematic thinking framework, we can more accurately assess and optimize the application of the Cognition-Action-Result framework.